I started to finally write a bit about Anna Karenina, and I think I've finally begun to articulate what moved me most about her story. I mean, the novel has essentially two protagonists and Anna is only on of them (the other being Levin), but I was definitely far more captivated by the book's namesake. I listened to Anna on audiobook, and I actually found the experience far more rewarding than any past audiobook (the reader was exceptional, I think).
First of all, the fact that Tolstoy so effectively got inside the mind of a woman is both laudable and, as a woman, almost uncomfortable. I was shocked at how much I identified and understood Anna's thought processes and was all but blushing at moments to hear some emotions that I know I've experienced so adequately described and articulated. There were times that I was squirming. Admittedly, there's much that Anna did that I have not done, but I was unprepared to identify with her so much.
But the fact that, as a man, Tolstoy was able to so poignantly portray the vast complexities of a female character such as Anna left me wondering if maybe most of Anna's internal struggle was actually universally human and not merely feminine--though the way her struggle manifests itself in jealousy, etc, in many ways (unfortunately) defines the feminine stereotype. I think there may be some truth to this because I think that we as society often chalk up some women's struggles as peculiar to the female gender when perhaps the struggle is more common to all mankind than all mankind cares to admit. Maybe, I'm just speculating.
Anyway, the other thing that surprised me is that the end that Anna made for herself (depending on your theology/philosophy) made me unexpectedly thankful for feminism. I didn't expect that reaction but I felt my heart "going out" to Anna who, Tolstoy makes clear, is a very intelligent, broad minded, passionate, principled and--for all (original) intents and purposes--moral woman. Anna was amazing, she was the pinnacle of what a Russian woman in society was to be, for the novel paints that picture well in the first parts of the story. She was the envy of the Russian elite--and the elite ended up (ah, human nature) delighting in her downfall when it came.
But this same society however required her first to marry to live. Then such a marriage had its proper duties and appearances to keep up. But what affected me the most was that the eventuality for Anna was that the intellectual and spiritual confines of the life and existence into which she seemed even willingly fall (at first) ended up being far, far less than the depth that her beautiful soul needed for her true satisfaction.
And this is why she ended up turning to Vronsky. In my opinion, of course, this was not the correct venue to channel her dissatisfaction nor to find its fulfillment. I believe that our true fulfillment and satisfaction can never be found outside of a relationship with God--though certainly and even designedly relationships with people and especially marriage play a role in that as well. However, the deep yearning that Anna felt was an echo in her soul crying out for spiritual fulfillment that she would never be able to find in Count Vronsky.
For this, I felt an immense level of compassion for Anna, an amazing woman who was not socially or even religiously allowed live up to her true, God given potential. I think it's fair to say that the way the church and religion was put out to the Russian world in that day did no favors to Anna to find her path to what she truly needed. Indeed, there seems to have been an unhealthy marriage between the church and the social norms of the day that worked against her--and really against themselves.
In her deep and abiding dissatisfaction she turned to a man and it was her ruin. But I could even understand this part to a degree. There have been times in my life (albeit very few) when I have met someone, even if it was extremely briefly, that seemed to understand me to such a jarringly deep degree that I was left so completely fascinated and, well, transfixed on the connection that seemed to be between us--almost powerless. Obviously, it's never ended or even proceeded for me the way it did for Anna, but still, if I'm really honest the connection between her and Vronsky that utterly bewitched her isn't completely foreign to me. I can relate, poor thing.
But anyway, the whole story made me wonder if things would have been different for such a remarkable woman had she had more opportunity in her day (yes, I realize it's fiction). I have avenues to be healthier than she in my pursuit for wholeness, for fulfillment. This, I guess for me, was the true tragedy in the story.
And I found myself uttering thanks to God that I now live in a world where I don't have to marry to live, that I can explore the world, both geographically and intellectually, as much as I want and I have the resources at my tips to know GOD as much as my heart so desires. And if I ever marry, it will be because it's right, not because I have to. These things Anna never knew nor could she, arguably, in her day.
That said, I am not blaming Anna's adultery on society. I would be the last to absolve her of her behavior. Reasons for one's behavior do not automatically make excuses. I can see in the story where she would have been wiser to run...and she didn't. No, what I am saying is:
While she had a responsibility to navigate it better, and she tragically failed, Anna's world also tragically limited her in her time, and I'm grateful that my world is different than hers.
(Day 18)
First of all, the fact that Tolstoy so effectively got inside the mind of a woman is both laudable and, as a woman, almost uncomfortable. I was shocked at how much I identified and understood Anna's thought processes and was all but blushing at moments to hear some emotions that I know I've experienced so adequately described and articulated. There were times that I was squirming. Admittedly, there's much that Anna did that I have not done, but I was unprepared to identify with her so much.
But the fact that, as a man, Tolstoy was able to so poignantly portray the vast complexities of a female character such as Anna left me wondering if maybe most of Anna's internal struggle was actually universally human and not merely feminine--though the way her struggle manifests itself in jealousy, etc, in many ways (unfortunately) defines the feminine stereotype. I think there may be some truth to this because I think that we as society often chalk up some women's struggles as peculiar to the female gender when perhaps the struggle is more common to all mankind than all mankind cares to admit. Maybe, I'm just speculating.
Anyway, the other thing that surprised me is that the end that Anna made for herself (depending on your theology/philosophy) made me unexpectedly thankful for feminism. I didn't expect that reaction but I felt my heart "going out" to Anna who, Tolstoy makes clear, is a very intelligent, broad minded, passionate, principled and--for all (original) intents and purposes--moral woman. Anna was amazing, she was the pinnacle of what a Russian woman in society was to be, for the novel paints that picture well in the first parts of the story. She was the envy of the Russian elite--and the elite ended up (ah, human nature) delighting in her downfall when it came.
But this same society however required her first to marry to live. Then such a marriage had its proper duties and appearances to keep up. But what affected me the most was that the eventuality for Anna was that the intellectual and spiritual confines of the life and existence into which she seemed even willingly fall (at first) ended up being far, far less than the depth that her beautiful soul needed for her true satisfaction.
And this is why she ended up turning to Vronsky. In my opinion, of course, this was not the correct venue to channel her dissatisfaction nor to find its fulfillment. I believe that our true fulfillment and satisfaction can never be found outside of a relationship with God--though certainly and even designedly relationships with people and especially marriage play a role in that as well. However, the deep yearning that Anna felt was an echo in her soul crying out for spiritual fulfillment that she would never be able to find in Count Vronsky.
For this, I felt an immense level of compassion for Anna, an amazing woman who was not socially or even religiously allowed live up to her true, God given potential. I think it's fair to say that the way the church and religion was put out to the Russian world in that day did no favors to Anna to find her path to what she truly needed. Indeed, there seems to have been an unhealthy marriage between the church and the social norms of the day that worked against her--and really against themselves.
In her deep and abiding dissatisfaction she turned to a man and it was her ruin. But I could even understand this part to a degree. There have been times in my life (albeit very few) when I have met someone, even if it was extremely briefly, that seemed to understand me to such a jarringly deep degree that I was left so completely fascinated and, well, transfixed on the connection that seemed to be between us--almost powerless. Obviously, it's never ended or even proceeded for me the way it did for Anna, but still, if I'm really honest the connection between her and Vronsky that utterly bewitched her isn't completely foreign to me. I can relate, poor thing.
But anyway, the whole story made me wonder if things would have been different for such a remarkable woman had she had more opportunity in her day (yes, I realize it's fiction). I have avenues to be healthier than she in my pursuit for wholeness, for fulfillment. This, I guess for me, was the true tragedy in the story.
And I found myself uttering thanks to God that I now live in a world where I don't have to marry to live, that I can explore the world, both geographically and intellectually, as much as I want and I have the resources at my tips to know GOD as much as my heart so desires. And if I ever marry, it will be because it's right, not because I have to. These things Anna never knew nor could she, arguably, in her day.
That said, I am not blaming Anna's adultery on society. I would be the last to absolve her of her behavior. Reasons for one's behavior do not automatically make excuses. I can see in the story where she would have been wiser to run...and she didn't. No, what I am saying is:
While she had a responsibility to navigate it better, and she tragically failed, Anna's world also tragically limited her in her time, and I'm grateful that my world is different than hers.
(Day 18)